{ "url": "https://11d.im/yo/20220311101852/", "published": "Fri Mar 11 2022 11:18:52 GMT+0100 (Central European Standard Time)", "updated": "Tue Oct 08 2024 00:09:56 GMT+0200 (Central European Summer Time)", "author": { "name": "tk", "url": "https://11d.im" }, "content": "
\n

Dans End State, James Plunkett parcourt un certain nombre de sujets entre capitalisme et politiques publiques sur lesquels il serait possible d\u2019agir d\u00e8s maintenant. Il \u00e9voque notamment le sujet des grandes plateformes. Il y a plusieurs options face \u00e0 ce probl\u00e8me. Quelles soient trop grosses pour \u00e9chouer, vou\u00e9es \u00e0 dispara\u00eetre mais lentement ou r\u00e9ellement n\u00e9cessairement comme partie de l\u2019infrastructure du web, il faut faire temporairement avec. Son id\u00e9e est alors de les r\u00e9guler en exigeant un certain degr\u00e9 d\u2019ouverture ; plus sp\u00e9cifiquement en ce qui concerne les donn\u00e9es et leur exploitation.

\n

Dans cet entretien entre Casey Newton et Brandon Silverman, le g\u00e9rant d\u2019un service rachet\u00e9 par facebook, on retrouve exactement une application de cette id\u00e9e dans la probl\u00e9matique de la guerre informationnelle qui a lieu actuellement dans l\u2019invasion russe de l\u2019Ukraine.

\n
\n

One blind spot we have is that whatever platforms remove content, researchers can\u2019t study it. How would we benefit from, say, platforms letting academics study a Russian disinformation campaign that got removed from Twitter or Facebook or YouTube or TikTok?

\n

I think unlocking the potential of independent research on removed content accomplishes at least three really important things. First, it helps build a much more robust and powerful community of researchers that can study and understand the phenomenon, and help the entire industry make progress on it. (The alternative is leaving it entirely up to the platforms to figure out by themselves). Second, it helps hold the platforms accountable for whether they made the right decisions \u2014 and some of these decisions are very consequential. Third, it can help be a deterrent for bad actors as well.

\n

Source : Everything platforms know about the war but won't tell us

\n
\n

L\u2019acc\u00e8s aux donn\u00e9es des plateformes n\u2019est pas qu\u2019une question de recherche scientifique aussi mais un vrai enjeu pour la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 civile.

\n
\n

We should be building out more solutions that enable civil society to help be a part of managing the public spaces we\u2019ve all found ourselves in. We should lean on the idea that thriving public spaces only prosper when everyone feels some sense of ownership and responsibility for them.

\n

Source : Everything platforms know about the war but won't tell us

\n
\n

\u00c0 creuser aussi l\u2019article 31 du Digital Service Act europ\u00e9en.

\n
", "content-plain": "Dans End State, James Plunkett parcourt un certain nombre de sujets entre capitalisme et politiques publiques sur lesquels il serait possible d\u2019agir d\u00e8s maintenant. Il \u00e9voque notamment le sujet des grandes plateformes. Il y a plusieurs options face \u00e0 ce probl\u00e8me. Quelles soient trop grosses pour \u00e9chouer, vou\u00e9es \u00e0 dispara\u00eetre mais lentement ou r\u00e9ellement n\u00e9cessairement comme partie de l\u2019infrastructure du web, il faut faire temporairement avec. Son id\u00e9e est alors de les r\u00e9guler en exigeant un certain degr\u00e9 d\u2019ouverture ; plus sp\u00e9cifiquement en ce qui concerne les donn\u00e9es et leur exploitation.\n\nDans cet entretien entre Casey Newton et Brandon Silverman, le g\u00e9rant d\u2019un service rachet\u00e9 par facebook, on retrouve exactement une application de cette id\u00e9e dans la probl\u00e9matique de la guerre informationnelle qui a lieu actuellement dans l\u2019invasion russe de l\u2019Ukraine.\n\nOne blind spot we have is that whatever platforms remove content, researchers can\u2019t study it. How would we benefit from, say, platforms letting academics study a Russian disinformation campaign that got removed from Twitter or Facebook or YouTube or TikTok?\n\nI think unlocking the potential of independent research on removed content accomplishes at least three really important things. First, it helps build a much more robust and powerful community of researchers that can study and understand the phenomenon, and help the entire industry make progress on it. (The alternative is leaving it entirely up to the platforms to figure out by themselves). Second, it helps hold the platforms accountable for whether they made the right decisions \u2014 and some of these decisions are very consequential. Third, it can help be a deterrent for bad actors as well.\n\nSource : Everything platforms know about the war but won't tell us\n\nL\u2019acc\u00e8s aux donn\u00e9es des plateformes n\u2019est pas qu\u2019une question de recherche scientifique aussi mais un vrai enjeu pour la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 civile.\n\nWe should be building out more solutions that enable civil society to help be a part of managing the public spaces we\u2019ve all found ourselves in. We should lean on the idea that thriving public spaces only prosper when everyone feels some sense of ownership and responsibility for them.\n\nSource : Everything platforms know about the war but won't tell us\n\n\u00c0 creuser aussi l\u2019article 31 du Digital Service Act europ\u00e9en.", "syndication": [], "type": "entry", "name": "ouvrir les plateformes pour les r\u00e9guler" }